Players / ABS ranking / João Chaves

João Chaves

Licence 3444TieSports #28762+45Level 6

FPP ranking#3089published best #3089

FPP points141.512 valid results

Published record2–340% wins

5matches

2wins

3losses

3partners

2entries

0career podiums

Ranking history

0 seasons · published annual best

There is not enough historical data yet to draw a trend.

6 matches found in published draws

Date	Tournament	Partner	Opponents	Round	Result	Score
11 Sept21:30	The Campus OpenMasculinos 5 - Main	João Sousa	Weder Dos SantosDavid Lybeer	Round of 32	—	—
12 Aug22:00	Vilamoura Summer CupM5-Quali	João Caeiro	Vasco RibeiroPedro Ribeiro	Round of 16	Loss	7-6 (7) 7-6 (4)
12 Aug18:00	Vilamoura Summer CupM5-Quali	João Caeiro	Ricardo dos SantosMiguel Piedade	Round of 32	Win	6-3 6-2
14 Mar21:00	Open AlgarveM5 qB	Tico	André Gonçalves VendaDaniel Rodrigues	Round of 16	Loss	6-0 6-2
13 Mar22:00	Open AlgarveM5	Tico	Rui RibeiroFrancisco Santos	Round of 32	Loss	6-7(7) 6-1 10-4
13 Mar19:00	Open AlgarveQuali M5	Tico	Diogo NevesDavid Pádua	Round of 16	Win	6-4 3-6 6-4

2 published entries

Tournament	Partner	Category	Seed	Pair points	Status
The Campus Open11 Sept	João Sousa	Masculinos 5	#3	731.01	Confirmed
Vilamoura Summer Cup14 Aug	João Caeiro	Masculinos 5	#52	254.64	Confirmed

0 records in the public ledger

Tournament	Partner	Draw	Result	Points

3 found

1 tournaments

João Chaves

TTico

1 wins · 2 losses · 1 tournaments

13 Mar–11 Sept

LWLLW

8 Sept

— Match-by-match coverage is limited to 91 tournament pages with published, processed draws; older or unpublished draws are not included.
— The points history reflects the public ranking ledger and may not include every career entry.
— The career record includes published winners and runners-up; it does not represent every round played.
— Ranking history contains published annual bests, not every weekly update.
— One published tournament page could not be processed in this snapshot (2).

Updated 1 Sept · FPP / TieSports

Sources: FPP / TieSports and public Padel Federado publications · missing fields are not inferred