Players / ABS ranking / Gonçalo Santana

Gonçalo Santana
Lisboa Racket CentreLicence 26170TieSports #158219ABSLevel 6
FPP ranking#2408published best #2408
FPP points191.163 valid results
Published record4–544% wins
9matches
4wins
5losses
3partners
6entries
0career podiums
Ranking history
0 seasons · published annual bestThere is not enough historical data yet to draw a trend.
Match history
10 matches found in published drawsTournament entries
6 published entries| Tournament | Partner | Category | Seed | Pair points | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II Open SERUL by Monopólio Lusitano25 Sept | Nuno Godoy | Masculinos 5 | #12 | 349.76 | Pending |
| I OPEN PCG e Clube TAP27 Aug | Nuno Godoy | Masculinos 5 | #8 | 324.26 | Confirmed |
| Mimosa Open Porto 202624 Jul | Bernardo Almeida | Masculinos 5 | #17 | 888.82 | Confirmed |
| IAG7 & DHM Padel Open IPC14 May | Nuno Godoy | Masculinos 5 | #66 | 114.89 | Pending |
| Open Dream Padel21 Apr | Nuno Godoy | Masculinos 5 | #63 | 96.14 | Pending |
| Open Prosonic - UBBO | Nuno Godoy | Masculinos 5 | #77 | — | Confirmed |
Results with points
12 records in the public ledger| Tournament | Partner | Draw | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mimosa Open Porto 202626 Jul | Bernardo Almeida | Masculinos 5 - M5 - QP | Round of 16 | 121.88 |
| Open Lemonfit Absolutos29 Mar | Not published | Masculinos 6 - QP - M6 | Round of 16 | 3.41 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 519 Jul | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 3.13 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 528 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 4.69 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 521 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 3.13 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 56 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 524 May | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 1.56 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 517 May | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 6.25 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 59 May | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 4.69 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 525 Apr | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 512 Apr | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 529 Mar | Not published | Masculinos 5 - Grupo F | - | 1.56 |
Next points to expire
gross estimate; replacement results may reduce the loss| When | Tournament | Leaves ledger | Gross balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 203d29 Mar | Open Lemonfit AbsolutosMasculinos 6 - QP - M6 · Round of 16 | −3.41 | 187.75 |
| 203d29 Mar | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −1.56 | 186.19 |
| 217d12 Apr | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −9.38 | 176.81 |
| 230d25 Apr | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −9.38 | 167.43 |
| 244d9 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −4.69 | 162.74 |
| 252d17 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −6.25 | 156.49 |
| 259d24 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −1.56 | 154.93 |
| 272d6 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −9.38 | 145.55 |
| 287d21 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −3.13 | 142.42 |
| 294d28 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −4.69 | 137.73 |
| 315d19 Jul | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 5 - Grupo F · - | −3.13 | 134.6 |
| 322d26 Jul | Mimosa Open Porto 2026Masculinos 5 - M5 - QP · Round of 16 | −121.88 | 12.72 |
Updated 1 Sept · FPP / TieSports
Sources: FPP / TieSports and public Padel Federado publications · missing fields are not inferred