Players / ABS ranking / Tiago Mota

Tiago Mota
UltimateUrbanPadelLicence 28392TieSports #150453ABSLevel 6
FPP ranking#4782published best #4782
FPP points81.250 valid results
Published record0–10% wins
1matches
0wins
1losses
1partners
2entries
0career podiums
Ranking history
0 seasons · published annual bestThere is not enough historical data yet to draw a trend.
Match history
2 matches found in published draws| Date | Tournament | Partner | Opponents | Round | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept21:45 | FIP Silver Lisboa Racket Centre by AVA CR7Quali M6 | Ricardo Peixoto | Alex MendesDiogo Vieira | Round of 64 | — | — |
| 24 Jun19:00 | Open Ultimate Urban PadelQualy - M6 | Ricardo Peixoto | Gonçalo NunesRafael Silva | Round of 64 | Loss | 2-6 5-7 |
Tournament entries
2 published entries| Tournament | Partner | Category | Seed | Pair points | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP Silver Lisboa Racket Centre by AVA CR79 Sept | Ricardo Peixoto | Masculinos 6 | #55 | 207.38 | Confirmed |
| Open Ultimate Urban Padel24 Jun | Ricardo Peixoto | Masculinos 6 | #47 | 110.13 | Pending |
Results with points
12 records in the public ledger| Tournament | Partner | Draw | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VI Open CPA11 Oct | Not published | Masculinos 6 - M6-QP | Round of 32 | 5.91 |
| Liga Mudum - Fase Regional Zona 5 - Absolutos29 Aug | Not published | Masculinos 6 - M6-QP | - | 1.56 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 520 Jul | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 530 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 7.81 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 521 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 3.13 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 55 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 523 May | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 7.81 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 515 May | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 3.13 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 510 May | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 524 Apr | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 511 Apr | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 3.13 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 527 Mar | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo E | - | 6.25 |
Next points to expire
gross estimate; replacement results may reduce the loss| When | Tournament | Leaves ledger | Gross balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201d27 Mar | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −6.25 | 75 |
| 216d11 Apr | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −3.13 | 71.87 |
| 229d24 Apr | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −9.38 | 62.49 |
| 245d10 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −9.38 | 53.11 |
| 250d15 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −3.13 | 49.98 |
| 258d23 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −7.81 | 42.17 |
| 271d5 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −9.38 | 32.79 |
| 287d21 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −3.13 | 29.66 |
| 296d30 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −7.81 | 21.85 |
| 316d20 Jul | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 5Masculinos 6 - Grupo E · - | −9.38 | 12.47 |
| 356d29 Aug | Liga Mudum - Fase Regional Zona 5 - AbsolutosMasculinos 6 - M6-QP · - | −1.56 | 10.91 |
| 399d11 Oct | VI Open CPAMasculinos 6 - M6-QP · Round of 32 | −5.91 | 5 |
Updated 1 Sept · FPP / TieSports
Sources: FPP / TieSports and public Padel Federado publications · missing fields are not inferred